Ambiguity and Extremism in Elections
نویسندگان
چکیده
We analyze a model in which voters are uncertain about the policy preferences of candidates. Two forces a¤ect the probability of electoral success: proximity to the median voter and campaign contributions. First, we show how campaign contributions a¤ect elections. Then we show how the candidates may wish to announce a range of policy preferences, rather than a single point. This strategic ambiguity balances voter beliefs about the appeal of candidates both to the median voter and to the campaign contributors. If primaries precede a general election, they add another incentive for ambiguity, because in the primaries, the candidates do not want to reveal too much information, to maintain some freedom of movement in the policy space for the general election. Ambiguity has an option value.
منابع مشابه
The Causes of the Emergence of Islamic Extremism in the Wahhabi Sect and the Tendencies towards it
Extremism is a notion, which becomes meaningful in democratic and lawful societies. This is sometimes interchangeable with the terms, Fundamentalism and terrorism. It is often said that one who aims to fight against terrorism, must first challenge and overcome extremism. Thus, Analysis of the potentials of extremism in a society is highly articulated. Whereas Fundamentalism intends to bring abo...
متن کاملPolarization and Pandering in Common-value Elections
Standard election models robustly predict that candidates should adopt moderate policies, especially if they value winning o¢ ce, and that this is good for voter welfare. Empirical polarization is therefore both inexplicable and troubling. This paper shows that if voter di¤erences reect beliefs about an underlying truth variable, rather than idiosyncratic preferences, then polarization is the ...
متن کاملThe Challenges of the Elections Systems of Persian Gulf Arab Countries
This article intends to clarify views regarding important challenges that have originated from the political, social, cultural and geopolitical structures in the elections systems of Persian Gulf Arab countries. Challenges that determine the compatibility levels of elections systems of these countries with the world’s democratic systems. An efficient elections system is the prerequisite for the...
متن کاملWhy Primaries? The Party’s Tradeoff between Policy and Valence∗
We elaborate a theory to explain why and when political parties choose to hold primary elections. Party leaders face a trade-off between primary elections and elite-centered selections. The benefit of a primary is revealing the campaigning skills of candidates. Its cost is the ideological extremism that primary voters might induce on candidates. We find that primary elections are more likely wh...
متن کاملExpansion Factors of Extremism on the Continent of Africa and its Containment Strategies
In various parts of the world, the continent of Africa is struggling with the phenomenon of terrorism and extremism more than other regions. This continent, for various reasons, including the various weaknesses of software and hardware, including economic backwardness, political instabilities, social inequalities, and foreign interventions that find their interests only in insecurity and instab...
متن کامل